Odd IP Status Station Response involving Encryption

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • davis124
    Brainiac
    • Oct 2011
    • 50

    Odd IP Status Station Response involving Encryption

    Hello -

    I wanted to pose this to the group and see if they have seen this behavior and/or have an answer as to why it is showing up this way.

    We have a S8730 running CM 5.2.1 SP 02.1.016.4-19308.

    While doing a status station command on a IP Phone, I noticed this oddity:

    status station 96086 Page 8 of 10
    VOICE STATISTICS

    TN Code: TN2602AP Board loc: 01A0502
    Encryption: none
    DSP Number: 2 Endpoint ID: 34193
    UDP Port: 3172 Codec: G.711MU
    Dst Net Reg: 1
    Far-end IP Addr: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
    Echo Canc: y
    Echo Tail (ms): 0 Silence Suppresion: n
    Comfort Noise Gen: y Data Call/Type: n

    THRESHOLD DATA
    Total Exceptions: 0 Jitter Buffer Size (ms): 0
    Packet Size: 20 Jitter Buffer Overruns: 2
    % Packet Loss: 0 Jitter Buffer Underruns: 1
    Peak Packet Loss% : 0 Average Jitter (ms): 0
    Peak Jitter (ms): 0
    Avg RT Delay (ms): 2 Peak RT Delay (ms): 4

    status station 9xxxx Page 9 of 10
    SRC PORT TO DEST PORT TALKPATH
    src port: S00060
    S00060:TX:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:2796/g711u/20ms/1-srtp-aescm128-hmac80
    01A0502:RX:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:3172/g711u/20ms/1-srtp-aescm128-hmac80:TX:tdm:a185
    01A1314:RX:tdm:a185



    As you can see from the above status station command, we have a call up, tied to a DS1 and from the Voice Statistics it shows Encryption is NONE.

    But the next page (Talkpath) we see we are using the AESCM128-hmac80 encryption. So why is the Voice Statistics now showing this as none?

    I am GUESSING because the Maintenance Command Document doesn't make reference to this type of encryption maybe CM doesn't know what to display there, but seems odd to me that on one page it doesn't know what it is but the other page shows it.

    OR maybe because you can't encrypt over the DS1, but to me the Voice Statistics page is for IP only, so to me that theory doesn't make sense.

    Anyone run into this before and/or have a logical answer?

    Thanks -

    James
    James E. Davis
    10 years at Lucent/Avaya as a System Application Specialist
    4 years at Avaya as a TIER III Engineer
    Now working for UNMC as a System Admin/VoIP Engineer
Loading