When I execute a transfer on an IP phone at a very small site without Media Gateway, is there just one incoming RTP flow in progress during the whole transaction or is there a point when 2 incoming RTP flows coexist even if only one is heard at the IP phone? 
Example:
- I have a call in progress, one incoming RTP flow is active through the WAN interface for my call. There is an outgoing RTP flow too, of course.
- I press the transfer button so I now hear dial tone coming from a Media Gateway resource at another site. The other party hears Music-on-Hold, also coming from some Media Gateway resource at another site. But what happens to the RTP flow from the other party? Is it simply not existing anymore at the WAN interface of my site without Gateway or do I still have to account for it in bandwidth calculations?
Now the other way around: what happens to the RTP flow that my IP phone was sending across the WAN interface before I hit "transfer": is it no longer existing or is it still sent, possibly to the Media Gateway which generates the dial tone? I am still talking about the moment after I hit "Transfer", while hearing dial tone, before dialing the transfer destination.
I would assume that the RTP flow which is not supposed to be heard ceases to exist, but I have no certainty. The issue is that it does have an impact on how much real-time voice bandwidth I must reserve at very small sites without Media Gateway. For instance, I would book enough bandwidth for 5 parallel calls (and set CAC=5) at a site with 4 users to cope with this possibility.
The same discussion applies for initiating conferences or swapping between 2 or more lines with active calls. Do I always have just one incoming RTP flow or can as many flows exist as lines waiting + the active one?
Alternatively, is there a set of recommendations about how to cope with very small sites without gateway in terms of real time WAN bandwidth? Thanks in advance!

Example:
- I have a call in progress, one incoming RTP flow is active through the WAN interface for my call. There is an outgoing RTP flow too, of course.
- I press the transfer button so I now hear dial tone coming from a Media Gateway resource at another site. The other party hears Music-on-Hold, also coming from some Media Gateway resource at another site. But what happens to the RTP flow from the other party? Is it simply not existing anymore at the WAN interface of my site without Gateway or do I still have to account for it in bandwidth calculations?
Now the other way around: what happens to the RTP flow that my IP phone was sending across the WAN interface before I hit "transfer": is it no longer existing or is it still sent, possibly to the Media Gateway which generates the dial tone? I am still talking about the moment after I hit "Transfer", while hearing dial tone, before dialing the transfer destination.
I would assume that the RTP flow which is not supposed to be heard ceases to exist, but I have no certainty. The issue is that it does have an impact on how much real-time voice bandwidth I must reserve at very small sites without Media Gateway. For instance, I would book enough bandwidth for 5 parallel calls (and set CAC=5) at a site with 4 users to cope with this possibility.
The same discussion applies for initiating conferences or swapping between 2 or more lines with active calls. Do I always have just one incoming RTP flow or can as many flows exist as lines waiting + the active one?
Alternatively, is there a set of recommendations about how to cope with very small sites without gateway in terms of real time WAN bandwidth? Thanks in advance!
Comment